0001280: Wrong replication example at end of 3.8

(0002301)
shalom (manager)
2006-01-09 09:07

Also, Dave Rich proposed to change the text to read "Each replication represents a^n entire^ single dimension."

(0002533)
shalom (manager)
2006-04-15 11:41

But see the following from Dave Rich from Jan. 17:

It has come back to me. Some functionality has been garbled when '{} was added to {}.

Before we added the ', only one set of braces in a literal was represented by a replication. so {4{1}} could become the same as {1,1,1,1}, the inner set of braces is part of the replication, not part the assignment pattern.

so {2{1,1}} becomes {1,1,1,1}, it

Therefore I believe replication in assignment patters should only require one '

'{4{1,1}}

Dave

(0002591)
shalom (manager)
2006-04-25 02:22

See 0000943

(0003323)
shalom (manager)
2006-12-18 09:58

The example in 3.8 is dealt with in 0001666.

However, the text Dave referred to is in 8.13.1 and is not dealt with in 1666.

(0003329)
shalom (manager)
2006-12-28 01:28

The example in 3.8 is covered by 0001666.
The uploaded proposal here just covers Dave's requested change to 8.13.1.

(0003506)
mmaidment (manager)
2007-03-05 01:21

On January 8, 2007 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached proposal.

(0003714)
mmaidment (manager)
2007-05-25 16:31

Proposal needs to be updated for incorporation in 1800-2008 Draft 3.

(0003778)
shalom (manager)
2007-06-11 00:00

Updated to Draft 3

(0003897)
mmaidment (manager)
2007-07-09 12:11
edited on: 2007-07-09 12:12

The updated proposal, 1280_D3.htm, was unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote
that concluded on July 9, 2007.

(0004778)
Neil Korpusik (administrator)
2007-10-03 16:55

From Champions email vote ending on Sept 17

Passed with the following friendly amendments (4 yes and 2 not voting)

          1. I cannot assign a technical meaning to the phrase "multiple
             concatenations" in this context. This is the only occurrence of
             this phrase in Draft3a. The phrase "nested replications" is more
             intuitive to me. This choice also has the advantage of providing
             a target for the reference to "replication" in "Each replication
             represents an entire single dimension".
          2. I think that the sentence
                Each replication represents an entire single dimension.
             Should be in the "shall" mode of 1.5.

(0004889)
shalom (manager)
2007-10-05 02:41

For the record, replications are also called multiple concatenations where they are defined, in 11.4.12.1 (of Draft 4), and also in the BNF. But I agree that replication is the more common term.

I uploaded a new proposal with the changes, including a xref to 11.4.12.1.

(0005098)
Neil Korpusik (administrator)
2007-11-03 20:21

Feedback from the technical committee is needed on this one.
If the svbc is ok with the friendly amendments from the Champions it can
go on to the Working Group.

(0005189)
mmaidment (manager)
2007-11-12 23:09

On November 12, 2007 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached proposal.

(0005393)
Neil Korpusik (administrator)
2007-11-21 08:23

The proposal was unanimously approved by the Working Group in the
November 15th, 2007 conference call.

(0006842)
shalom (manager)
2008-05-15 09:16

Changes verified in Draft 5.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2006-01-05 23:01	Brad Pierce	New Issue
2006-01-05 23:01	Brad Pierce	Type	=> Errata
2006-01-09 09:07	shalom	Note Added: 0002301
2006-04-14 12:43	Brad Pierce	Status	new => assigned
2006-04-14 12:43	Brad Pierce	Assigned To	=> Greg_Jaxon
2006-04-15 11:41	shalom	Note Added: 0002533
2006-04-20 07:41	gordonv	Priority	normal => high
2006-04-20 07:41	gordonv	Severity	feature => major
2006-04-20 07:41	gordonv	Summary	Wrong example at end of 3.8 => Wrong replication example at end of 3.8
2006-04-25 02:22	shalom	Note Added: 0002591
2006-12-18 09:58	shalom	Note Added: 0003323
2006-12-28 01:27	shalom	File Added: 1280.htm
2006-12-28 01:28	shalom	Note Added: 0003329
2006-12-28 01:28	shalom	Assigned To	Greg_Jaxon => shalom
2006-12-28 01:29	shalom	Priority	high => immediate
2007-03-05 01:21	mmaidment	Note Added: 0003506
2007-03-05 01:21	mmaidment	Status	assigned => resolved
2007-03-05 01:21	mmaidment	Resolution	open => fixed
2007-05-25 16:31	mmaidment	Status	resolved => feedback
2007-05-25 16:31	mmaidment	Resolution	fixed => reopened
2007-05-25 16:31	mmaidment	Note Added: 0003714
2007-06-10 23:59	shalom	File Added: 1280_D3.htm
2007-06-11 00:00	shalom	Note Added: 0003778
2007-06-11 00:00	shalom	Status	feedback => assigned
2007-07-09 12:11	mmaidment	Note Added: 0003897
2007-07-09 12:11	mmaidment	Status	assigned => resolved
2007-07-09 12:11	mmaidment	Resolution	reopened => fixed
2007-07-09 12:12	mmaidment	Note Edited: 0003897
2007-10-03 16:55	Neil Korpusik	Note Added: 0004778
2007-10-05 02:41	shalom	Note Added: 0004889
2007-10-05 02:42	shalom	File Added: 1280_D4_response_to_champions_feedback.htm
2007-10-05 02:43	shalom	Issue Monitored: shalom
2007-11-03 20:21	Neil Korpusik	Status	resolved => feedback
2007-11-03 20:21	Neil Korpusik	Resolution	fixed => reopened
2007-11-03 20:21	Neil Korpusik	Note Added: 0005098
2007-11-12 23:09	mmaidment	Note Added: 0005189
2007-11-12 23:09	mmaidment	Status	feedback => resolved
2007-11-12 23:09	mmaidment	Resolution	reopened => fixed
2007-11-21 08:23	Neil Korpusik	Note Added: 0005393
2007-11-21 08:23	Neil Korpusik	Status	resolved => approved
2008-04-11 23:56	Stuart Sutherland	Status	approved => completed
2008-04-11 23:56	Stuart Sutherland	Fixed in Version	=> P1800-2008/D5
2008-05-15 09:16	shalom	Status	completed => closed
2008-05-15 09:16	shalom	Note Added: 0006842

Notes
(0002301) shalom (manager) 2006-01-09 09:07	Also, Dave Rich proposed to change the text to read "Each replication represents a^n entire^ single dimension."

(0002533) shalom (manager) 2006-04-15 11:41	But see the following from Dave Rich from Jan. 17: It has come back to me. Some functionality has been garbled when '{} was added to {}. Before we added the ', only one set of braces in a literal was represented by a replication. so {4{1}} could become the same as {1,1,1,1}, the inner set of braces is part of the replication, not part the assignment pattern. so {2{1,1}} becomes {1,1,1,1}, it Therefore I believe replication in assignment patters should only require one ' '{4{1,1}} Dave

(0002591) shalom (manager) 2006-04-25 02:22	See 0000943

(0003323) shalom (manager) 2006-12-18 09:58	The example in 3.8 is dealt with in 0001666. However, the text Dave referred to is in 8.13.1 and is not dealt with in 1666.

(0003329) shalom (manager) 2006-12-28 01:28	The example in 3.8 is covered by 0001666. The uploaded proposal here just covers Dave's requested change to 8.13.1.

(0003506) mmaidment (manager) 2007-03-05 01:21	On January 8, 2007 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached proposal.

(0003714) mmaidment (manager) 2007-05-25 16:31	Proposal needs to be updated for incorporation in 1800-2008 Draft 3.

(0003778) shalom (manager) 2007-06-11 00:00	Updated to Draft 3

(0003897) mmaidment (manager) 2007-07-09 12:11 edited on: 2007-07-09 12:12	The updated proposal, 1280_D3.htm, was unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote that concluded on July 9, 2007.

(0004778) Neil Korpusik (administrator) 2007-10-03 16:55	From Champions email vote ending on Sept 17 Passed with the following friendly amendments (4 yes and 2 not voting) 1. I cannot assign a technical meaning to the phrase "multiple concatenations" in this context. This is the only occurrence of this phrase in Draft3a. The phrase "nested replications" is more intuitive to me. This choice also has the advantage of providing a target for the reference to "replication" in "Each replication represents an entire single dimension". 2. I think that the sentence Each replication represents an entire single dimension. Should be in the "shall" mode of 1.5.

(0004889) shalom (manager) 2007-10-05 02:41	For the record, replications are also called multiple concatenations where they are defined, in 11.4.12.1 (of Draft 4), and also in the BNF. But I agree that replication is the more common term. I uploaded a new proposal with the changes, including a xref to 11.4.12.1.

(0005098) Neil Korpusik (administrator) 2007-11-03 20:21	Feedback from the technical committee is needed on this one. If the svbc is ok with the friendly amendments from the Champions it can go on to the Working Group.

(0005189) mmaidment (manager) 2007-11-12 23:09	On November 12, 2007 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached proposal.

(0005393) Neil Korpusik (administrator) 2007-11-21 08:23	The proposal was unanimously approved by the Working Group in the November 15th, 2007 conference call.

(0006842) shalom (manager) 2008-05-15 09:16	Changes verified in Draft 5.

Relationships