too many functions?

Subject: too many functions?
From: Rob Anderson (rob@reawebtech.com)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 13:12:20 PST

• Next message: David Bishop: "Re: too many functions?"
• Previous message: David Bishop: "Re: match functions"
• Next in thread: David Bishop: "Re: too many functions?"
• Reply: David Bishop: "Re: too many functions?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

John Wrote:

> >If there is a logic-state meaning, 1164 should
> > add the function; if there is a computational
> > meaning, numeric-std.

Then David B. wrote:

>
> Agreed. Unfortunately this got overlooked when 1164 was originally
> published.
>
> The new "match" functions in 1076.3 (numeric_std) would only
> be for the "signed" and "unsigned" types.

This question is not answered:

"match" does not have a computational meaning, so why
are we adding it to numeric_std?

--Rob

• Next message: David Bishop: "Re: too many functions?"
• Previous message: David Bishop: "Re: match functions"
• Next in thread: David Bishop: "Re: too many functions?"
• Reply: David Bishop: "Re: too many functions?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 12 2002 - 13:06:57 PST